Buried by national politics and international upheaval, the release of "A Strategic Framework for a National Plan on Aging" that was sent to Congress probably missed your attention. According to the "Interagency Coordinating Committee on Healthy Aging and Age-friendly Communities" (ICC) that issued the report:

The vision for the plan is aspirational and encouraging, even if it is a lofty statement:

"Our vision is an America that values older adults, embraces aging, and recognizes that all people have the right to live with dignity, make their own choices, and participate fully in society. We want to be a nation that prioritizes independence, inclusion, well-being, and health across the lifespan."

That just gives you an inkling of the implications of a "national plan on aging," You can read the entire Strategic Framework here.

While the framework appears to have a great deal of merit, Richard Eisenberg, reporting for Next Avenue, asked seven experts on aging about it. They "expressed skepticism about whether the government plan's goals were achievable given today's political climate and federal budget constraints."

As the well-known aging expert Ken Dychtwald, CEO of consulting firm AgeWave, told Eisenberg, "I really do hope that they're wildly successful, and reading it I thought, 'Wow, look at all they pulled together.'" But, he added, "I was struck by the baked-in complexity and the absence of a time-based game plan."

It's well worth reading Eisenberg's reporting on the Strategic Framework, as well as reviewing the Framework for yourself.

My first impression is that, like many visionary plans, this one looks great on paper. However, an attempt to implement or coordinate a national plan on anything that suggests the need for broad consensus and agreement on funding likely has little chance of gaining traction.

Until the branches of the U.S. government can coalesce around what's important in caring for and meeting the needs of our aging population, I regret saying I don't think we'll approach something resembling "a national plan on aging."

Still, let's remember that there was great skepticism when Social Security and Medicare were new ideas -- but somehow, they became law. Today, Social Security and Medicare provide vital support to those 65 and older and prove that, to some extent, the federal government can do right by seniors.

It is important to note that the ICC was only just funded in federal fiscal year 2023, so its work has just begun. One can only hope that it will continue on the visionary path it has already established -- and that it will make a real difference in the future.

Image from the cover of the report, "Aging in the United States: A Strategic Framework for a National Plan on Aging."

HappilyRewired.com is a Wearever Top 20 Senior Blog and a Top 75 Baby Boomer Blog

Check out Books for Boomers!